George W. Bush in Guatemala

Bush used his visit in Guatemala today to showcase the "compassion" of U.S. policies.

I don't understand why the media follows the presidents and protests.  They report on a farcical show  Maybe it's important to record the political conversations of two heads of state for important developments, but to follow a political entourage is to ask to be misled.  When members of the media rarely do look the other way, they don't try very hard, opting for extremist images of flag and efigy burning instead of any semblance of reality.  The result is images of smiling children, grateful "villagers", and happy Indians, alongside ugly, evil, and violent protests.  It's like we're asking for misinformation

The Bush administration tried to put forth a complex message today, though, which I confess I'm pretty impressed with.  One of a few stops was with a cooperative, Labradores Mayas, that was started up with USAID money and now supplies the Central American Wal-Mart with produce.  It was a message of free trade helping even the indigenous peoples in these countries.  It's a patronizing message, but a complex one, and I think this patranization is illustrated ever so slightly by the label villagers on a whitehouse photo.

The reality is of course a different one.  Geopolitics is a useful tool in determining how the majority of indigenous are living.  Bush visited Chimaltenango, adjacent to Guatemala's capital, the most prosperous region in the country.  The majority of indigenous people live in the highlands, isolated from the Guatemalan economy.  I'm not making a judgement on free trade, but I am saying Labradores Mayas is the exception not the rule. 

The last thing I'll say regards the attempt by Bush to show compassion.  I can't help but bring up the recent raids in New Bedford, MA, where children have been seperated from deported parents.  Bush didn't budge on these detentions today in Guatemala, saying "The United States will enforce our law".  Again I'm not making a judgement, but there is certainly no compassion in that position.  To close on this media them, I leave you with the images of smiling children in Guatemala, and crying children in New Bedford.

PS  The most nuanced coverage of this trip is definitely found in Prensa Libre, for those of you that can speak spanish.  They even wrote on Bush's poor Spanish, as he's messed up a phrase over and over again on his trip.








Comments

  • Re: George W. Bush in Guatemala

    kyle, why would you refuse to pass judgement on free trade/neoliberalism?

    surely the economic logic of the last 20-30 years bears some of the burden for the present injustices?


    • Re: George W. Bush in Guatemala

      The reason I didn't speak on the subject is because it is a complicated one.  Probably the most useful knowledge I've come up with on this subject comes from Roberto Unger:  "In history obedience rarely pays; what pays is defiance."

      To fundamentally judge that free trade is bad for the region is a difficult statement to make.  The way I see it is that most of the opposition to free trade and globalization comes from protectionist industries in the U.S. and the voter blocks that the employees represent, and this opposition does not have the interests of the globe at heart.  I actually don't see free trade as the problem in Central America, the problem is that the free trade agreements are fundamentally in the U.S.'s favor.  That is to say Central America had to jump through so many hoops with CAFTA--The U.S. gave up nothing.  It's ironic that opposition to the legislation came mostly in the U.S.  Even Hugo Chavez has his trade blocks in South America with Mercosur.

      Now neoliberal policies in general is a different story, which is why it is troubling you've put the two so close together.  Neoliberalism does have a great deal of document Latin American opposition, and a lot of grassroots opposition.  Policies like the privatization of water in Cochabamba, Bolivia, are the equivalent of murder.  That's not to say that this type of thinking is not useful at times.  But the general rule is that completely following policies imposed on you by outside entities will likely result in disaster, as they are not accountable in any way to the people they are affecting.  Please continue this discussion, it's a complex one


    • Leonid



    • Leonid



    • Leonid



  • FGames



  • FGames



  • Re: George W. Bush in Guatemala

    Speaking of George W. Bush:

    George W. Bush committed hate crimes of epic proportions and with the stench of terrorism (indicated in my blog).

    George W. Bush did in fact commit innumerable hate crimes.

    And I do solemnly swear by Almighty God that George W. Bush committed other hate crimes of epic proportions and with the stench of terrorism which I am not at liberty to mention.

    Many people know what Bush did.

    And many people will know what Bush did—even to the end of the world.

    Bush was absolute evil.

    Bush is now like a fugitive from justice.

    Bush is a psychological prisoner.

    Bush has a lot to worry about.

    Bush can technically be prosecuted for hate crimes at any time.

    In any case, Bush will go down in history in infamy.

    Submitted by Andrew Yu-Jen Wang
    B.S., Summa Cum Laude, 1996
    Messiah College, Grantham, PA
    Lower Merion High School, Ardmore, PA, 1993

    “GEORGE W. BUSH IS THE WORST PRESIDENT IN U.S. HISTORY” BLOG OF ANDREW YU-JEN WANG
    ______________________
    I am not sure where I had read it before, but anyway, it is a linguistically excellent statement, and it goes kind of like this: “If only it were possible to ban invention that bottled up memory so it never got stale and faded.” Oh wait—off the top of my head—I think the quotation came from my Lower Merion High School yearbook.







search this blog